« The Future of the CEC | Main | TTD and PTD Rate »
Tuesday
Aug062019

New Attack on PPD

Even though the Oklahoma Supreme Court has previously opined that the Legislature has the constitutional right to require permanent partial disability (PPD) awards to be based upon the "latest edition" of the AMA guides, a new angle of attack is the subject of two pending cases.....Gordon George v. Umicore Autocat USA, Inc., Supreme Court number 118115; and Amanda Byrd v. Mazzio's LLC, being filed tomorrow.
   The two cases allege that the "latest edition" of the AMA Guides that is required by the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act is actually the Fifth Edition, because the Physicians Advisory Committee never approved the Sixth Edition. In fact, the PAC rejected the use of the Sixth Edition after it came out in 2009. These latest cases also allege the Hill decision on the AMA Sixth was premature because of the lack of PAC approval. 
   The 2019 Legislature changed the "latest edition" to the "Sixth Edition," but these two cases could affect cases in the first five years of AWCA jurisdiction.
​---Bob Burke (8/5/19)

 

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>